An employee forged medical certifcates issued by a clinic to support his absence from work. He was jailed for one year after he admitted to three counts of forgery for the purpose of cheating. He had forged the certificates by scanning the documents and reproducing copies on his computer. Fifteen other similar charges were taken into consideration by the Court for sentencing.
A woman was jailed 12 months and fined $170,000 for running a pornographic video shop.
A woman splashed urine on the front door of a neighbour's apartment and was fined $1,500. She was caught in the act by a closed-circuit television. She could have been jailed for up to two years.
Preventive detention - drug addicts
A man who had been in drug-rehabilitation centres eight times failed to report for urine tests at a police station. He was jailed for 18 months (9 months jail on each charge, with two terms to run consecutively. Lim could have been fined up to $10,000 and jailed for up to four years on each charge. Once he had been convicted of three or more offences, two sentences had to run consecutively.
He appealed and the CJ increased it to seven years. Lim had a history of convictions for rioting, armed robbery, causing hurt and theft. The CJ exercised his powers under section 216 of the Criminal Procedure Code to keep him in prison for as long as possible.
Nippon Paint introduced its "3-in-1" multi-purpose wall paint in 1995. In 1999, ICI Paint launched a new paint "Supreme 3-in-1". Nippon Paint cried foul and sued ICI for passing off its paint as the original "3-in-1". ICI Paint cans have a colourful and completely distinct and different look and could not be confused with Nippon's. The court dismissed the claim. It held there is nothing inventive, novel or unique in the "3-in-1" expression. It is merely a descriptive term.
0 comments:
Post a Comment